Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Sylvia Oliver, petitioner, v. Richard Velasquez, respondent.
DECISION, ORDER & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, in effect, to compel the respondent to determine the petitioner's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendants in an action entitled Oliver v Commissioner of Dept. of Finance, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 17394/10, and application by the petitioner for poor person relief.
ORDERED that the application for poor person relief is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022(b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied; and it is further,
ORDERED that the branch of the petition which is to compel the respondent to determine the petitioner's motion for leave to enter a default judgment against the defendants in an action entitled Oliver v Commissioner of Dept. of Finance, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 17394/10, is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, as that motion was determined by the Supreme Court on April 28, 2011; and it is further,
ADJUDGED that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The extraordinary remedy of mandamus will lie only to compel the performance of a ministerial act and only when there exists a clear legal right to the relief sought (see Matter of Legal Aid Socy. of Sullivan County v Scheinman, 53 N.Y.2d 12, 16). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought.
DILLON, J.P., LEVENTHAL, HALL and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2011–03635
Decided: June 14, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)