Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Paul McKay, appellant.
Argued—May 17, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Silber, J.), rendered February 26, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), reckless endangerment in the second degree, and reckless driving, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree and vacating the sentence imposed thereon; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant's contention that he was denied his statutory right to testify before the Grand Jury (see CPL 190.50[5][a] ) is without merit. The People properly notified him of the Grand Jury proceeding and accorded him a reasonable time to appear (see People v. Sawyer, 96 N.Y.2d 815, 816; People v. Pugh, 207 A.D.2d 503, 503). The record supports the conclusion that his failure to testify was based on his own actions (see People v. Rojas, 29 AD3d 405, 406; People v. Dunham, 292 A.D.2d 269, 269; People v. Quinones, 280 A.D.2d 559, 560; People v. Clark, 267 A.D.2d 4, 4; People v. Savareese, 258 A.D.2d 484, 484). The People rescheduled the defendant's testimony to accommodate an alleged medical condition and there is nothing in the record indicating that this medical condition prevented him from appearing at the rescheduled time. Under the circumstances, the People did not need to reschedule an additional time in order to meet their obligations under CPL 190.50(a)(5) (see People v. Quinones, 280 A.D.2d at 560).
The defendant's conviction of reckless endangerment in the second degree (see Penal Law § 120.20), however, must be vacated. That count of the indictment had been dismissed prior to trial and was mistakenly submitted to the jury (see People v. Long, 56 AD3d 685, 685; People v. Flores, 43 AD3d 955, 955; People v. Romero, 309 A.D.2d 953, 954; People v. Harris, 229 A.D.2d 595, 595).
MASTRO, J.P., DICKERSON, CHAMBERS and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–03266 (Ind.No. 10728 /06)
Decided: June 07, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)