Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Colleen Morgridge, appellant.
Argued—May 16, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kron, J.), rendered December 10, 2008, convicting her of criminal possession of marijuana in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant was tried and convicted of criminal possession of marijuana in the first degree, which required a finding that she knowingly and unlawfully possessed in excess of 10 pounds of marijuana (see Penal Law § 221.30). Pursuant to a search warrant, the police recovered over 20 pounds of marijuana from bins located in the kitchen of the defendant's apartment. The police also recovered a bag containing one-eighth of an ounce of marijuana on the defendant's bedroom dresser. At trial, the defendant asked the Supreme Court to submit the crime of unlawful possession of marijuana as a lesser-included offense. The Supreme Court denied the request.
Pursuant to CPL 300.50, a court in its discretion may, in addition to submitting the greatest offense which it is required to submit, submit any lesser-included offenses, as long as there is a reasonable view of the evidence which would support a finding that the defendant committed the lesser offense but did not commit the greater (see People v. Davis, 14 NY3d 20, 23). Furthermore, “[i]f the court is authorized ․ to submit a lesser included offense and is requested by either party to do so, it must do so” (CPL 300.50[2] ).
Here, although unlawful possession of marijuana is a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of marijuana in the first degree (see e.g. People v. Turdo, 74 A.D.2d 614), there was no reasonable view of the evidence that the defendant committed the lesser, but not the greater offense (see People v. Davis, 14 NY3d at 23).
The defendant's remaining contention is unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, without merit.
DILLON, J.P., BELEN, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–00014 (Ind.No. 10300 /07)
Decided: June 07, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)