Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Daniel Castiglione, etc., appellant, v James F. Quinn, etc., respondent.
Argued—February 25, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, Jr., J.), entered January 6, 2010, which denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
On October 31, 2007, the plaintiff's daughter was sitting on the curb at the corner of Idle Hour Blvd. and Biltmore Avenue in Oakdale when she was struck in the left eye by an egg allegedly thrown by the defendant's son. The plaintiff commenced this action, inter alia, to recover damages for the personal injuries sustained by his daughter as a result of the incident. Issue was joined, and the plaintiff moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Supreme Court denied the motion, and we affirm.
The plaintiff failed to tender sufficient evidence to establish his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. The conclusory assertions in the affidavit of the plaintiff's daughter were insufficient to demonstrate the absence of any material issues of fact and warrant summary judgment (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the motion, without regard to the sufficiency of the opposition papers (see Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853).
The parties' remaining contentions are without merit or need not be reached in light of our determination.
MASTRO, J.P., CHAMBERS, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–01034 (Index No. 16246 /08)
Decided: June 07, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)