Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Maury B. Josephson, et al., appellants, v. M.L. Moskowitz & Co., Inc., doing business as Equity Now, et al., respondents.
Submitted—May 9, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for fraud and violations of General Business Law §§ 349 and 350, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, Jr., J.), entered April 1, 2010, which granted those branches of the respective motions of the defendant M.L. Moskowitz & Co., Inc., doing business as Equity Now, and the defendants Option One Mortgage Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee for the Structured Asset Investment Loan Trust, 2005–5, which were for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the defendants appearing separately and filing separate briefs.
Contrary to the plaintiffs' contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the defendants' respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against each of them. In response to the defendants' respective prima facie showings of their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, the plaintiffs failed to demonstrate the existence of a triable issue of fact (see Zuckerman v. City of New York, 49 N.Y.2d 557, 562). The plaintiffs made only conclusory allegations that they justifiably relied on the defendants' alleged misrepresentations or that they were injured by any such alleged misrepresentations, deceptive business practices, or false advertising.
The plaintiffs' remaining contentions lack merit.
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–05053 (Index No. 8769 /07)
Decided: May 31, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)