Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Rodney Ferrer, appellant.
Submitted—March 24, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Freehill, J.), rendered April 24, 2008, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the facts, the indictment is dismissed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Orange County, for the purpose of entering an order in its discretion pursuant to CPL 160.50.
In fulfilling our responsibility to conduct an independent review of the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15[5]; People v. Danielson, 9 NY3d 342), we nevertheless accord great deference to the factfinder's opportunity to view the witnesses, hear the testimony, and observe demeanor (see People v. Mateo, 2 NY3d 383, 410, cert denied 542 U.S. 946; People v. Bleakley, 69 N.Y.2d 490).
An element of the crime of assault in the second degree pursuant to Penal Law 120.05(7) is that a person causes physical injury to another person. Physical injury is defined as “impairment of physical condition or substantial pain” (Penal Law § 10.00[9] ). In this case, the complainant sustained a cut to the nose and some bruising and swelling of his cheek and scraped both knees. Although he sought medical attention, no evidence was adduced that he required medical treatment or that he missed any days of work. Under the circumstances of this case, the jury's finding that the complainant suffered substantial pain and, thus, a physical injury within the meaning of Penal Law § 10.00(9), was against the weight of the evidence (see Matter of Philip A., 49 N.Y.2d 198, 199–200; People v. Baksh, 43 AD3d 1072, 1073–1074; People v. DiStefano, 252 A.D.2d 530, 530–531; cf. People v. Chiddick, 8 NY3d 445, 446; People v. Williams, 23 AD3d 589, 590; People v. Piersa, 196 A.D.2d 896, 897). Accordingly, the judgment of conviction must be reversed and the indictment dismissed.
In light of our determination, the parties' remaining contentions have been rendered academic.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, LOTT and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008–04016 (Ind.No. 07–00675)
Decided: May 31, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)