Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Abigail G. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Barrington G. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Kahi G. (Anonymous). Suffolk County Department of Social Services, respondent; Barrington G. (Anonymous), appellant. (Proceeding No. 2)
Submitted—May 9, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Robert C. Mitchell, Central Islip, N.Y. (John B. Belmonte of counsel), attorney for the children.
In two related child protective proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Budd, J.), dated July 16, 2010, which, after a fact-finding hearing, determined that he neglected the child Kahi G. and derivatively neglected the child Abigail G.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's finding that the father neglected the child Kahi G. by using excessive corporal punishment was supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B]; see also Matter of Maria Raquel L., 36 AD3d 425; Matter of Joshua B., 28 AD3d 759; Matter of Joseph O., 28 AD3d 562; Matter of Alysha M., 24 AD3d 255; Matter of Sheneika V., 20 AD3d 541; Matter of Jonathan W., 17 AD3d 374; Matter of Johannah QQ., 266 A.D.2d 769; Matter of Suffolk County Dept. of Social Servs. v Nicole S., 266 A.D.2d 556). Furthermore, the father's excessive corporal punishment of Kahi G. demonstrated a fundamental defect in the father's understanding of his parental duties and, therefore, constituted derivative neglect as to Abigail G. (see Family Ct Act § 1046[a][i]; see also Matter of Jasmine A., 18 AD3d 546, 547).
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–07940 (Docket No. N–19599–09, N–19600–09)
Decided: May 24, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)