Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Timothy Browning, appellant.
Submitted—January 4, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Rooney, J.), dated February 22, 2010, which denied his motion to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant's release from imprisonment while his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46 was pending does not render this appeal academic (see People v. Overton, AD3d, 2011 N.Y. Slip Op 04278 [2d Dept 2011] ).
However, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion for resentencing on substantial justice grounds. The defendant was convicted of two violent felonies prior to the commission of the instant drug offenses, and during his incarceration on the instant offenses, he received disciplinary tickets for 10 Tier III and 20 Tier II infractions, including tickets for possession of drugs and possession of a weapon. In addition, the defendant's parole was revoked on multiple occasions for parole violations. Under these circumstances, substantial justice dictated that the motion be denied (see People v. Colon, 77 AD3d 849; People v. Pipkin, 77 AD3d 770; People v. Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 747–748; People v. Perez, 57 AD3d 921, 922; People v. Flores, 50 AD3d 1156, 1156–1157; People v. Stamps, 50 AD3d 827, 828).
FLORIO, J.P., ENG, BELEN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–01972 (Ind.No. 624 /95)
Decided: May 24, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)