Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: JALIL McC. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-appellant; Denise C. (Anonymous), respondent-respondent, Steven Banks, nonparty-appellant.
In a child neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the attorney for the child and the petitioner, Administration for Children's Services, separately appeal from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (McGowan, J.), dated August 4, 2010, which, after a hearing, dismissed the petition.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and the facts, without costs or disbursements, the petition is reinstated, it is found that Denise C., the maternal grandmother of the subject child, neglected the subject child, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for a dispositional hearing.
A “[n]eglected child” is defined by the Family Court Act as one “whose physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the failure of [the] parent or other person legally responsible for his care to exercise a minimum degree of care ․ in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship” (Family Ct. Act § 1012[f][i][B] ). Here, a preponderance of the evidence presented at the fact-finding hearing demonstrated that shortly after the maternal grandmother and legal guardian of the subject child had him taken to the psychiatric ward at Elmhurst Hospital, the grandmother was informed that the child was ready to be discharged back into her care. The grandmother, however, refused to take the child. The petitioner repeatedly attempted to arrange a meeting with the grandmother, but she refused to attend, indicating that she was unwilling to take him home, did not want to have anything to do with the child, and would accept the charges of neglect against her. Thus, by refusing to take the child back into her home or to cooperate with the petitioner in arranging for his appropriate care, the grandmother neglected him (see Matter of Janice G. [Linda H.], 70 A.D.3d 1210, 1211, 894 N.Y.S.2d 238; Matter of Chantel ZZ., 279 A.D.2d 669, 670–672, 717 N.Y.S.2d 802; Matter of James R., 174 Misc.2d 133, 140, 663 N.Y.S.2d 760).
Accordingly, the petition must be reinstated, we find that the grandmother neglected the subject child, and the matter is remitted to the Family Court, Queens County, for a dispositional hearing.
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Decided: May 17, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)