Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Gerard Prior, et al., appellants, v. Board of Trustees of City of New York Fire Department Pension Fund, et al., respondents.
Argued—April 11, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Trustees of the City of New York Fire Department Pension Fund, which awarded Doreen Noone benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law § 208–f as the domestic partner of Kevin Prior, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jacobson, J.), dated January 6, 2010, which denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
New York City firefighter Kevin Prior died in the line of duty at the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. His name appears in chapter 468 of the Laws of 2002 (hereinafter the Act) as a firefighter whose “registered” or “unregistered domestic partner” is eligible to receive the special accidental death benefit provided by General Municipal Law § 208–f (L 2002, ch 468, 1238–1239, as amended by L 2003, ch 162, 792–796). Part A, section 1(b) of the Act defines a “domestic partner” as a person who “(i) was dependent upon the firefighter for support as shown by either unilateral dependence or mutual interdependence, as evidenced by a nexus of factors including, but not limited to, children in common, common ownership of real or personal property, signs of intent to marry, common householding, shared budgeting, and the length of the personal relationship with the firefighter; or (ii) was registered as the domestic partner of the firefighter ․ prior to the firefighter's death” (L 2002, ch 468, § 1[b], 1239).
Contrary to the petitioners' contention, the record supports the determination that Doreen Noone was Kevin Prior's unregistered “domestic partner” within the meaning of the Act. The Act neither mandates that every factor must be satisfied nor does it require that every factor must be given the same weight. Further, the definition of “domestic partner” indicates that the factors are not exclusive.
RIVERA, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–01977 (Index No. 11979 /06)
Decided: May 10, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)