Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Irace Realty Associates, respondent, v. Board of Assessors, et al., appellants.
Argued—April 7, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In a consolidated proceeding pursuant to Real Property Tax Law article 7 to review real property tax assessments for the tax years 2003 through 2007, the Board of Assessors, the Assessment Review Commission of Nassau County, and the County of Nassau appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Bucaria, J.), entered April 20, 2009, which, after a nonjury trial, inter alia, is in favor of the petitioner and against them reducing the assessments.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
At trial, the petitioner met its initial burden of coming forward with substantial credible evidence of the invalidity of the challenged real property assessments, by presenting a credible, competent appraisal (see 22 NYCRR 202.59[g][2]; Matter of Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. v Assessor of Town of Geddes, 92 N.Y.2d 192, 196; Matter of FMC Corp. [Peroxygen Chems. Div.] v Unmack, 92 N.Y.2d 179, 191).
Contrary to the appellants' contentions, there is no evidence that the comparable rents relied upon by the petitioner in its calculations were not the fruit of arm's-length negotiations (see Matter of County Dollar Corp. v City of Yonkers, 97 A.D.2d 469, 473). Thus, we perceive no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination that the petitioner established by a preponderance of the evidence that its real property was overvalued in each of the tax years in question (see Matter of FMC Corp. [Peroxygen Chems. Div.] v Unmack, 92 N.Y.2d at 188; Matter of Jo–Be Props., LLC v. Board of Assessors, 69 AD3d 942).
SKELOS, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009–05904 (Index No. 403266 /05)
Decided: May 03, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)