Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marilyn Dobies, et al., appellants, v. Girl Scouts of Westcheter Putnam, Inc., respondent, et al., defendants.
Submitted—April 8, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (Nicolai, J.), dated February 17, 2010, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Girl Scouts of Westchester Putnam, Inc., which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
“[T]he imposition of liability for a dangerous condition on property must be predicated upon occupancy, ownership, control, or special use of the premises” (James v. Stark, 183 A.D.2d 873, 873; see Ellers v Horwitz Family Ltd. Partnership, 36 AD3d 849; Marrone v. South Shore Props., 29 AD3d 961). Here, the defendant Girl Scouts of Westchester Putnam, Inc. (hereinafter the defendant), established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that it did not own, occupy, control, put to a special use, or have any right or obligation to maintain the parking lot where the accident occurred (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320). In opposition, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
MASTRO, J.P., BELEN, CHAMBERS and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–03676 (Index No. 5 /08)
Decided: May 03, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)