Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Erik McKay, appellant, v. Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, etc., et al., respondents.
Argued—April 5, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Velasquez, J.), dated February 2, 2010, as denied his motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff was attempting to board a bus owned and operated by the defendant Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority and the defendant New York City Transit Authority and driven by the defendant Toney Robinson (hereinafter collectively the defendants). He allegedly was injured when, while attempting to board the bus, the bus doors were closed on him before he was completely on the bus and the bus began to move, dragging him and causing him to strike a bus-stop sign. The plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants and thereafter moved for summary judgment on the issue of liability. The Supreme Court denied the motion. We affirm.
The plaintiff demonstrated his prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law. In opposition, however, the defendants raised triable issues of fact regarding the plaintiff's comparative fault (see Ortiz v. Pina, 298 A.D.2d 509, 510; Shea v. New York City Tr. Auth., 289 A.D.2d 558, 559; Gross v. New York City Tr. Auth., 256 A.D.2d 128, 130). Accordingly, the Supreme Court correctly denied the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
In light of our determination, the parties' remaining contentions need not be addressed.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, BALKIN and ENG, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–03660 (Index No. 43840 /07)
Decided: May 03, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)