Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Yvette Collins, respondent, v. Westchester County Airport, et al., defendants, Signature Flight Support Corporation, appellant.
Argued—March 14, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant Signature Flight Support Service Corporation appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Liebowitz, J.), entered January 25, 2010, as denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and the motion of the defendant Signature Flight Support Corporation for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it is granted.
The plaintiff, an experienced flight attendant, allegedly was injured when she was walking on a ramp where several airplanes were parked and was knocked over by a jet blast from one of the airplanes (hereinafter the subject airplane) when its engine was started. The plaintiff commenced this action to recover damages for personal injuries against, among others, Signature Flight Support Corporation (hereinafter the defendant), which leased the ramp and provided certain services to the airplanes using the ramp, such as fueling and de-icing, but which did not own, operate, or control the subject airplane.
The defendant met its prima facie burden of demonstrating its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that it did not owe a duty to the plaintiff to protect her from the subject jet blast (cf. Pulka v. Edelman, 40 N.Y.2d 781, 783; Stone v. Williams, 97 A.D.2d 509, 509–510, affd on other grounds, 64 N.Y.2d 639; see generally Matter of New York City Asbestos Litig., 5 NY3d 486; Mojica v. Gannett Co., Inc., 71 AD3d 963). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact. Accordingly, the defendant's motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it should have been granted.
SKELOS, J.P., ENG, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–01646 (Index No. 24760 /07)
Decided: April 19, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)