Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Eric A. Stewart, a suspended attorney. Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District, petitioner; Eric A. Stewart, respondent. (Attorney Registration No. 4296653) DISCIPLINARY proceeding instituted by the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District. The respondent was admitted to the Bar at a term of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Third Judicial Department on January 26, 2005, under the name Eric Alan Stewart. Gary L. Casella, White Plains, N.Y. (Gloria J. Anderson of counsel),
OPINION & ORDER
PER CURIAM. By decision and order on motion of this Court dated October 13, 2010, the respondent was immediately suspended from the practice of law, pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.4(l)(1)(i) and (iii), upon a finding that he constituted an immediate threat to the public interest based upon his failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee for the Ninth Judicial District (hereinafter the Grievance Committee) and other uncontroverted evidence of professional misconduct. In that order, the Grievance Committee was authorized to institute and prosecute a disciplinary proceeding against the respondent based upon a verified petition dated June 7, 2010. The respondent was directed to submit an answer to the verified petition within 20 days after service upon him of a copy of the decision and order on motion, and the issues raised by the verified petition and any answer thereto were referred to Norman B. Lichtenstein, Esq., as Special Referee to hear and report.
The verified petition contains five charges of professional misconduct alleging failure to cooperate with the Grievance Committee; neglect of a legal matter and/or failure to carry out a contract of employment entered into with a client for professional services; engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation, which reflects adversely on his fitness as a lawyer; and failing to re-register as an attorney and counselor-at-law.
The decision and order on motion dated October 13, 2010, was personally served upon the respondent on October 20, 2010. Although the respondent was granted an extension of time within which to submit an answer to the verified petition, he failed to do so. He is, therefore, in default, and the charges must be deemed established.
Accordingly, the Grievance Committee's motion to adjudicate the respondent in default is granted, the charges in the verified petition are deemed established and, effective immediately, the respondent is disbarred on default and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law.
PRUDENTI, P.J., MASTRO, RIVERA, SKELOS, DILLON, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the Grievance Committee's motion is granted; and it is further,
ORDERED that, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, effective immediately, the respondent, Eric A. Stewart, is disbarred and his name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that the respondent, Eric A. Stewart, shall continue to comply with this Court's rules governing the conduct of disbarred, suspended, and resigned attorneys (see 22 NYCRR 691.10); and it is further,
ORDERED that pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90, the respondent, Eric A. Stewart, is commanded to continue to desist and refrain from (1) practicing law in any form, either as principal, agent, clerk, or employee of another, (2) appearing as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, Judge, Justice, board, commission, or other public authority, (3) giving to another an opinion as to the law or its application or any advice in relation thereto, and (4) holding himself out in any way as an attorney and counselor-at-law; and it is further,
ORDERED that if the respondent, Eric A. Stewart, has been issued a secure pass by the Office of Court Administration, it shall be returned forthwith to the issuing agency and the respondent shall certify to the same in his affidavit of compliance pursuant to 22 NYCRR 691.10(f).
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–05595
Decided: April 19, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)