Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: GREGG FREEMAN, Appellant, v. STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT POTSDAM et al., Respondents.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: February 8, 2011
Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Demarest, J.), entered January 7, 2010 in St. Lawrence County, which dismissed petitioner's application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review an administrative agreement entered into between petitioner and respondent Chip Morris.
While petitioner was a student at respondent State University of New York at Potsdam, he was charged with violating the school's disciplinary code. After he resolved the charges through an administrative agreement, he challenged the school's procedures and sought to modify or annul the agreement. His administrative appeal was unsuccessful, leading him to commence this CPLR article 78 proceeding, which Supreme Court dismissed. Petitioner appeals.
Petitioner graduated in May 2010 and the school never enforced the sanction against him. Because the parties are no longer involved in any actual controversy and petitioner's rights will not be directly affected by any determination this Court could render, this appeal is moot (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d 707, 713–714 [1980]; Matter of Goodman v. Crew, 239 A.D.2d 578, 578–579 [1997] ). The exception to the mootness doctrine does not apply, requiring us to dismiss the appeal (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v. Clyne, 50 N.Y.2d at 714–715; Matter of Cornelius v. City of Oneonta, 71 AD3d 1282, 1285 [2010] ).
Lahtinen, J.P., Kavanagh and Garry, JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 510675
Decided: April 14, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)