Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marilyn Zanelli, appellant, v. JMM Raceway, LLC, et al., defendants, Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corporation, respondent.
Submitted—March 23, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Butler, J.), entered June 7, 2010, as denied her motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corporation, upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiff's motion for leave to enter judgment on the issue of liability against the defendant Stasi Brothers Asphalt Corporation (hereinafter the defendant), upon its default in appearing or answering the complaint. Considering the lack of any prejudice to the plaintiff as a result of the defendant's relatively short delay in answering, the existence of a potentially meritorious defense, and the public policy favoring the resolution of cases on the merits, the Supreme Court properly excused the defendant's delay in answering (see Giha v. Giannos Enters., Inc., 69 AD3d 564, 565; Stuart v. Kushner, 39 AD3d 535, 536; Harcztark v. Drive Variety, Inc., 21 AD3d 876).
To the extent the plaintiff argues that the Supreme Court should not have granted the defendant leave to serve a late answer, we note that the order appealed from did not grant such relief.
MASTRO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN, LOTT and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010–06254 (Index No. 9299 /09)
Decided: April 05, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)