Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Janiyah T. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Lateek C. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 1) In the Matter of Kamiyah C. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Lateek C. (Anonymous), appellant, et al., respondent. (Proceeding No. 2)
Submitted-January 24, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In two related child abuse and neglect proceedings pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, Lateek C. appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a fact-finding order of the Family Court, Kings County (Olshansky, J.), dated January 7, 2010, as, after a hearing, found that he neglected Janiyah T. and derivatively neglected Kamiyah C.
ORDERED that the fact-finding order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court's determination that Lateek C. (hereinafter the appellant) neglected the child Janiyah T. was supported by a preponderance of the evidence. A “neglected child” is defined by the Family Court Act as one “whose physical, mental or emotional condition has been impaired or is in imminent danger of becoming impaired as a result of the failure of [the] parent ․ to exercise a minimum degree of care ․ in providing the child with proper supervision or guardianship” (Family Ct Act § 1012[f][i][B] ). The petitioner established, by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046[b][i] ), that the appellant's conduct impaired the mental or emotional well-being of Janiyah T., or placed that child in imminent danger of such impairment (see Family Ct Act § 1012[f]; Nicholson v. Scoppetta, 3 NY3d 357; Matter of Kevin M.H. [Kenneth H.], 76 AD3d 1015). Accordingly, the Family Court properly found that the appellant neglected Janiyah T.
Further, the appellant's neglect of Janiyah T. evinced a flawed understanding of his duties as a parent and demonstrated an impaired level of parental judgment sufficient to support the Family Court's finding of derivative neglect of the child Kamiyah C. (see Matter of Lauryn H. [William A.], 73 AD3d 1175; Matter of Grant W. [Raphael A.], 67 AD3d 922).
In light of our determination, the appellant's remaining contentions need not be addressed.
SKELOS, J.P., DICKERSON, AUSTIN and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-01700 (Docket Nos. N-616-08, N-617-08)
Decided: March 22, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)