Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Symeon Monioudis, respondent, v. City of New York, appellant (and a third-party action).
Submitted-February 3, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (R. Miller, J.), dated September 10, 2009, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff was working in a courthouse owned by the defendant and using a ladder to prepare the walls and ceiling for painting when the ladder collapsed, causing him to fall and sustain injuries.
The plaintiff established, prima facie, his entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability on the cause of action alleging a violation of Labor Law § 240(1) by submitting his deposition testimony, which demonstrated that he fell when the ladder he was using collapsed, and that the failure to provide a secure ladder proximately caused his injuries (see Gordon v. Eastern Ry. Supply, 82 N.Y.2d 555, 561-562; McCaffery v Wright & Co. Constr., Inc., 71 AD3d 842, 843; Yin Min Zhu v. Triple L. Group, LLC, 64 AD3d 590; Gilhooly v Dormitory Auth. of State of New York, 51 AD3d 719, 720; Rivera v. Dafna Constr. Co., Ltd., 27 AD3d 545).
In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The defendant did not offer any evidence, only mere speculation, to oppose the prima facie case or create a bona fide issue regarding the plaintiff's credibility as to a material fact (see Klein v. City of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 833, 835; McCaffery v Wright & Co. Constr., Inc., 71 AD3d at 843; Barr v. 157 5 Ave., LLC, 60 AD3d 796, 797-798; Rivera v. Dafna Constr. Co., Ltd., 27 AD3d at 545-546; cf. Duran v Kijak Family Partners, L.P., 63 AD3d 992, 994). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability on the cause of action pursuant to Labor Law § 240(1).
ANGIOLILLO, J.P., FLORIO, BELEN and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-11072 (Index No. 37192 /03)
Decided: March 15, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)