Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Matthew Gelfand, et al., respondents, v. Adjo Contracting Corp., et al., defendants, Town of Hempstead, appellant (and a third-party action).
Argued-February 22, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Town of Hempstead appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered October 5, 2009, which, upon two decisions of the same court entered January 23, 2009, and June 26, 2009, respectively, made after a bifurcated nonjury trial on the issues of liability and damages, is in favor of the plaintiffs and against it in the principal sum of $625,000.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
In reviewing the Supreme Court's determination, made after a nonjury trial, our authority “is as broad as that of the trial court” and we “may render the judgment ․ warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” (Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499 [internal quotation marks omitted] ). We discern no basis to disturb the Supreme Court's determination that the appellant was not entitled to prior written notice because the appellant created the dangerous condition that caused the injured plaintiff's accident through an affirmative act of negligence (see Magidenko v. Consolidated Edison, 3 AD3d 553, 554; Maggio v. City of New York, 305 A.D.2d 554, 555; Akley v. Clemons, 237 A.D.2d 780, 781-782; Parks v. Hutchins, 162 A.D.2d 666; see also Tumminia v. Cruz Constr. Corp., 41 AD3d 585; Perrington v. City of Mt. Vernon, 37 AD3d 571, 572; Padula v. City of Long Beach, 20 AD3d 555; see generally Amabile v. City of Buffalo, 93 N.Y.2d 471, 474; Kiernan v. Thompson, 73 N.Y.2d 840, 842).
The appellant's remaining contention is without merit.
SKELOS, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-09638 (Index No. 13652 /05)
Decided: March 15, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)