Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: IBN WOOD, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Calendar Date: February 2, 2011
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule.
Petitioner was charged in a misbehavior report with conspiring with another inmate to introduce a controlled substance into the correctional facility. The charge arose from a correction sergeant's investigation of an inmate who was found to be in possession of marihuana and who implicated petitioner as his supplier. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charge. The determination was later affirmed on administrative appeal with a modified penalty. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.
We confirm. The misbehavior report, together with the testimony of correction officials involved in the investigation and the documentation related thereto, provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Smart v New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., 75 AD3d 1017, 1017-1018 [2010]; Matter of Brown v. Fischer, 73 AD3d 1362, 1363 [2010] ). While petitioner denied the charge and the inmate who implicated him recanted his prior statement, this conflicting testimony presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Perez v. Bezio, 76 AD3d 1134 [2010]; Matter of Norris v. Fischer, 71 AD3d 1211, 1212-1213 [2010] ). Petitioner's assertion that the misbehavior report did not provide him with adequate notice of the charged misconduct is not preserved for our review due to his failure to raise it at the hearing or in his administrative appeal (see Matter of Valdez v. Fischer, 74 AD3d 1596, 1597 [2010]; Matter of Weathersby v. Goord, 257 A.D.2d 934, 935 [1999] ). His remaining procedural arguments are likewise unpreserved.
Peters, J.P., Lahtinen, Stein and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
ENTER:
Robert D. Mayberger
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 510524
Decided: March 17, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)