Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Lillian George, appellant.
Submitted-February 1, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a resentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Brennan, J.), imposed March 4, 2009, which, upon her conviction of assault in the first degree, after a jury trial, imposed a period of postrelease supervision in addition to the determinate term of imprisonment previously imposed on December 20, 2000.
ORDERED that the resentence is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted, after a jury trial, of assault in the first degree in connection with a January 1, 2000, stabbing incident. On December 20, 2000, she was sentenced to a determinate prison term of 10 years, but the sentencing court did not pronounce the required 5-year period of postrelease supervision, and the original sentence and commitment sheet does not contain any reference to postrelease supervision. On March 4, 2009, after the defendant served approximately 81/212 years of her prison term, and only three weeks before she was to be conditionally released from prison, the sentencing court vacated the original sentence and resentenced her to the same 10-year determinate prison term, to be followed by a period of 5 years of postrelease supervision.
Since the defendant had not yet been released from incarceration for the crime in question when she was resentenced, her resentencing to a term including the statutorily required period of postrelease supervision did not subject her to double jeopardy or violate her right to due process of law (see People v. Negron, 78 AD3d 1079, 1079-1080; People v. Misla, 78 AD3d 735; People v. Ragbirsingh, 78 AD3d 738; People v. Ware, 78 AD3d 743, 744; People v. Pruitt, 74 AD3d 1366, 1367; People v. Tillman, 74 AD3d 1251; People v. Mendez, 73 AD3d 951; People v. Murrell, 73 AD3d 598, lv granted 15 NY3d 854; People v. Parisi, 72 AD3d 989, lv granted 15 NY3d 776; People v. Becker, 72 AD3d 1290, 1291; People v. Scalercio, 71 AD3d 1060; People v. Prendergast, 71 AD3d 1055, lv granted 15 NY3d 808; cf. People v. Jordan, 15 NY3d 727, 728; People v. Williams, 14 NY3d 198, cert denied US, 131 S Ct 125).
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-03044 (Ind.No. 1472 /00)
Decided: March 08, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)