Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Glen Witkowski, appellant.
Submitted-February 10, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Grosso, J.), dated March 12, 2010, which, after a hearing, denied his motion for resentencing pursuant to CPL 440.46, on his conviction of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree, which sentence was originally imposed, upon his plea of guilty, on October 14, 2004.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed.
The defendant was convicted, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (see Penal Law § 220.16), based on an offense committed in 2003, and was sentenced in October 2004 to an indeterminate term of 6 to 12 years of imprisonment. In January 2010 the defendant moved to be resentenced pursuant to CPL 440.46, which extends to certain eligible individuals in the custody of the Department of Correctional Services who were convicted of a class B felony offense defined in Penal Law article 220 committed prior to January 13, 2005, the opportunity to seek a resentence in accordance with the resentencing provisions of the Drug Law Reform Act of 2004 (see CPL 440.46[1], [3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23). The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion.
The defendant had an extensive criminal history dating back to 1996, and the instant offense was committed two months after he was released on parole. Moreover, during the defendant's incarceration, he has committed numerous Tier 3 and Tier 2 infractions, including, among other things, carrying a concealed razor, fighting with fellow inmates, setting another inmate's bed on fire, and possession of gang-related materials. Under these circumstances, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the defendant's motion (see CPL 440.46[3]; L 2004, ch 738, § 23; People v. Winfield, 59 AD3d 747, 748; People v. Perez, 57 AD3d 921, 922; People v. Flores, 50 AD3d 1156; People v. Vega, 40 AD3d 1020, 1020-1021; People v. Sanders, 36 AD3d 944).
PRUDENTI, P.J., ENG, BELEN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-03198 (Ind.No. 10916 /03)
Decided: March 08, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)