Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Vernon S. Heath, respondent, v. Juan R. Liberato, appellant.
Submitted-January 28, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schack, J.), dated July 19, 2010, which granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law on the issue of liability by demonstrating that the defendant driver violated Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1141 when he made a left turn directly into the path of the plaintiff's vehicle and thereby failed to yield the right of way to the plaintiff (see Berner v. Koegel, 31 AD3d 591; Gabler v. Marly Bldg. Supply Corp., 27 AD3d 519; Maloney v. Niewender, 27 AD3d 426). The plaintiff submitted an affidavit which established that he was lawfully proceeding into the intersection with a green light in his favor when the defendant made a left turn into the intersection. The defendant admitted in an affidavit that he never saw the plaintiff's vehicle, as he believed the intersection was “clear” before he made his left turn at the green light. A driver is negligent if he or she fails to see that which through proper use of the senses should have been seen (see Breslin v. Rudden, 291 A.D.2d 471; Botero v. Erraez, 289 A.D.2d 274; Ferrara v. Castro, 283 A.D.2d 392).
In opposition, the defendant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The defendant's opposition merely raised “feigned” issues of fact, which are insufficient to defeat a motion for summary judgment (Capraro v. Staten Is. Univ. Hosp., 245 A.D.2d 256, 257; see Miller v. City of New York, 214 A.D.2d 657; Garvin v. Rosenberg, 204 A.D.2d 388). The defendant also failed to demonstrate that further discovery was warranted (see Benedikt v. Certified Lbr. Corp., 60 AD3d 798; Lopez v. WS Distrib., Inc., 34 AD3d 759).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability.
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and MILLER, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-08556 (Index No. 31991 /09)
Decided: March 08, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)