Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Vernell Cheeseboro, petitioner, v. Board of Education of Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District, et al., respondents.
Argued-February 10, 2011
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Board of Education of the Port Chester-Rye Union Free School District, dated October 16, 2009, which, after a hearing pursuant to Civil Service Law § 75, found the petitioner guilty of charges of misconduct and incompetence, and terminated her employment.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
Contrary to the petitioner's contention, the determination that she was guilty of misconduct and incompetence was supported by substantial evidence in the record, including, inter alia, eyewitness testimony regarding an incident in which the petitioner instructed a student to convey a threat and profanity to another student (see 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 N.Y.2d 176, 179-180; Matter of Overton v Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City School Dist., 72 AD3d 1094; Matter of Cardenas v Board of Educ. of Yonkers City School Dist., 298 A.D.2d 390; see also Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d 222, 230).
Moreover, the penalty of termination was not so disproportionate to the offense as to be shocking to one's sense of fairness, thus constituting an abuse of discretion as a matter of law (see Matter of Kreisler v. New York City Tr. Auth., 2 NY3d 775; Matter of Kelly v. Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32, 38; Matter of Pell v Board of Educ. of Union Free School Dist. No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale & Mamaroneck, Westchester County, 34 N.Y.2d at 237; Matter of Overton of Board of Educ. of the Yonkers City School Dist., 72 AD3d 1094).
The petitioner's remaining contentions are without merit.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, DICKERSON and COHEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-03639 (Index No. 4149 /10)
Decided: March 01, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)