Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
William A. Zutt, et al., respondents, v. State of New York, appellant.
Argued-December 16, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, for permanent injunctive relief to abate a private nuisance, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Putnam County (O'Rourke, J.), entered October 20, 2009, which granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their cause of action to permanently enjoin the defendant from draining water onto their property, and directed it to comply with the recommendations of the plaintiffs' expert to direct storm water away from the plaintiffs' property and into a natural stream nearby.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on their cause of action to permanently enjoin the defendant from continuing to drain storm water runoff onto their property (see Higgins v. Village of Orchard Park, 277 A.D.2d 989, 991, cf. Warm v. State of New York, 308 A.D.2d 534, 536). The plaintiffs made a prima facie showing of entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, and the defendant failed to raise any triable issues of fact in opposition (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320, 324; Winegrad v. New York Univ. Med. Ctr., 64 N.Y.2d 851, 853). The conclusory assertions of the defendant's expert witness were insufficient to oppose the motion for summary judgment (see generally Gonzalez v. 98 Mag Leasing Corp., 95 N.Y.2d 124, 129; Mandel v. Benn, 67 AD3d 746).
“[A] court of equity has an obligation to go no further than absolutely necessary to protect the rights of the complaining parties. The injunction must be framed as narrowly as possible” (Antinelli v. Toner, 74 A.D.2d 996, 997 [citations omitted] ). Here, the Supreme Court properly directed the defendant to comply with the recommendations of the plaintiffs' expert to direct storm water away from the plaintiffs' property and into a natural stream nearby.
PRUDENTI, P.J., ANGIOLILLO, FLORIO and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-10586 (Index No. 2684 /06)
Decided: January 25, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)