Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Nelson Campos, etc., respondent, v. Beth Israel Medical Center, et al., appellants.
Submitted-December 21, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice and lack of informed consent, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Baisley, Jr., J.), entered June 17, 2010, which denied their motion to preclude the plaintiff's expert and any other witnesses called by the plaintiff from testifying concerning certain unpleaded allegations relating to the defendants' alleged malpractice on the ground that the plaintiff failed to provide timely notice of these additional theories of liability in their pleadings and bills of particulars.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the facts and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and the defendants' motion is granted.
The expert witness disclosure required by CPLR 3101(d) was served by the plaintiff 61/212 years after the incidents complained of, 4 years after the action was commenced, almost 4 years after the original bill of particulars was served, and 11/212 years after the amended bill of particulars was served. The expert witness disclosure contained new theories of liability which were not readily discernable from the allegations set forth in the bills of particulars. Accordingly, under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in denying the defendants' motion to preclude the plaintiff's expert and any other witnesses called by the plaintiff from testifying concerning certain unpleaded allegations relating to the defendants' alleged malpractice in, inter alia, leaving the patient, Hilda Campos, unattended, leaving the bed rails of her bed down, and allowing her to fall out of her hospital bed onto the floor (see Navarette v. Alexiades, 50 AD3d 869, 870; Navarette v. Alexiades, 50 AD3d 872, 872; Durant v. Shuren, 33 AD3d 843, 844).
DILLON, J.P., DICKERSON, HALL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-06967 (Index No. 8536 /05)
Decided: January 18, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)