Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
American Home Mortgage, etc., respondent, v. Melvin Villaflor, et al., appellants, et al., defendants.
Submitted-January 5, 2011
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Garvey, J.), entered July 17, 2009, which, after a hearing, denied their motion to vacate so much of a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court dated June 4, 2008, as was entered against the defendant Melvin Villaflor upon his failure to appear or answer the complaint, and to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against that defendant for lack of personal jurisdiction.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
This Court possesses the authority to review a determination rendered after a hearing which is as broad as that of the hearing court, and may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account that in a close case, the hearing court had the advantage of seeing the witnesses (see Northern Westchester Professional Park Assoc. v Town of Bedford, 60 N.Y.2d 492, 499). Here, the hearing court's determination that the defendant Melvin Villaflor was properly served pursuant to CPLR 308(1) was supported by the credible testimony of the process server adduced at the hearing (see King v. Gil, 69 AD3d 678; Federal Fin. Co. v Public Adm'r, Kings County, 47 AD3d 881, 882; Ahrens v. Chisena, 40 AD3d at 788), and we discern no basis for disturbing that determination.
MASTRO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, BALKIN, LOTT and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-02750 (Index No. 4427 /07)
Decided: January 18, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)