Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Nyanda Charley, appellant.
Argued-November 30, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Loehr, J.), rendered January 5, 2009, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
In general, a plea of guilty precludes appellate review of all nonjurisdictional issues (see e.g. People v. Motley, 69 N.Y.2d 870, 871-872; People v. Gerber, 182 A.D.2d 252, 260). As part of his plea bargain, the defendant “waive[d] [appellate review of] all motions previously made in this case.” He also knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v. Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256). His current contention that CPL 710.70(2) nonetheless requires, or at least permits, this Court to review a prior order, in which the County Court denied that branch of his omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence seized pursuant to a search warrant, is therefore without merit (see People v. Kemp, 94 N.Y.2d 831, 833; People v. Pena, 73 AD3d 1216).
The defendant's contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of trial counsel, to the extent that such issue is not encompassed in the defendant's waiver of his right to appeal, is without merit (cf. People v. Ramos, 77 AD3d 773). There is also no merit to his claim that the County Court erred in denying his presentence motion to withdraw his plea of guilty (see e.g. People v. Fiumefreddo, 82 N.Y.2d 536, 548; People v. Tinsley, 35 N.Y.2d 926, 927).
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, ANGIOLILLO and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-01850 (Ind.No. 07-01531)
Decided: January 11, 2011
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)