Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Kevin Kostic, appellant, v. Ascent Media Group, LLC, respondent, et al., defendants (and a third-party action).
Argued-November 30, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Berliner, J.), dated September 29, 2009, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendant Ascent Media Group, LLC, which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The defendant Ascent Media Group, LLC (hereinafter the defendant), established its prima facie entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence demonstrating that it did not create or have actual or constructive notice of the icy condition in its parking lot which allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall (see Crosthwaite v. Acadia Realty Trust, 62 AD3d 823, 824; Wylie v. Brooks/Eckerd Pharmacy, 49 AD3d 533, 534; Murphy v. 136 N. Blvd. Assoc., 304 A.D.2d 540). General awareness that, at times, an icy condition developed in the parking lot during winter months was insufficient to constitute notice of the specific condition that allegedly caused the plaintiff to fall (see Mauge v. Barrow St. Ale House, 70 AD3d 1016, 1017). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Alvarez v. Prospect Hosp., 68 N.Y.2d 320).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the defendant's motion which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.
RIVERA, J.P., DILLON, ANGIOLILLO and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-10330 (Index No. 9414 /07)
Decided: December 14, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)