Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Michael Q. McNair, appellant.
Submitted-November 23, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered September 1, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
At the time of sentencing, the defendant was presented with documents requesting that he forfeit to the People, among other things, three cellular phones considered proceeds of his crime (see CPLR 1311[1] ). After conferring with counsel, the defendant executed the documents, agreeing to forfeit the phones instead of subjecting himself to a civil lawsuit, in which the People were likely to prevail.
The defendant contends that his plea was involuntarily obtained because he was not informed at the time of his plea that the People would request that he forfeit the cellular phones pursuant to CPLR article 13-A. The defendant's contention is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v. Toxey, 86 N.Y.2d 725, 726; People v. Smith, 43 AD3d 474, 475). In any event, contrary to the defendant's contention, the People's request that he forfeit the phones, which he expressly agreed to after conferring with counsel, was a collateral, not a direct, consequence of his plea of guilty (see CPLR 1311 [1]; People v. Gravino, 14 NY3d 546, 553-557; People v. Ford, 86 N.Y.2d 397, 402-403; Holtzman v. Roman, 141 A.D.2d 601; see also United States v United States Currency in the Amount of $ 228,536.00, 895 F.2d 908, 914-915, cert denied sub nom. Parker v. United States, 495 U.S. 958; cf. People v. Catu, 4 NY3d 242, 244-245). Accordingly, the defendant's plea was knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently made.
The defendant was not deprived of the effective assistance of counsel (see People v. Caban, 5 NY3d 143, 152; People v. Benevento, 91 N.Y.2d 708, 712).
COVELLO, J.P., ANGIOLILLO, DICKERSON and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-08733 (Ind.No. 28 /09)
Decided: December 14, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)