Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Richard McAllister, appellant.
Submitted-October 7, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), rendered June 25, 2008, convicting him of manslaughter in the second degree, assault in the second degree, reckless endangerment in the first degree, criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is modified, on the law, by vacating the conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, vacating the sentence imposed thereon, and dismissing that count of the indictment; as so modified, the judgment is affirmed.
As the defendant argues and the People correctly concede, criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree is a lesser-included offense of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (see Penal Law §§ 265.01[1], 265.03[1][b]; People v. Headley-Ombler, 270 A.D.2d 358, 359; People v. Gonzalez, 227 A.D.2d 641, 642; People v. Chatman, 122 A.D.2d 148, 149). Thus, we vacate the conviction and sentence for criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree and dismiss that count of the indictment (see CPL 300.40[3][b]; People v. Headley-Ombler, 270 A.D.2d at 359; People v. Gonzalez, 227 A.D.2d at 642).
The sentences imposed on the remaining counts were not excessive (see People v. Suitte, 90 A.D.2d 80).
FISHER, J.P., SANTUCCI, ENG and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2008-06330 (Ind.No. 2741 /06)
Decided: November 23, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)