Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Marjam Supply Company, Inc., respondent, v Drywall Surgeon Specialists, Inc., defendant, Anthony Orlando, appellant.
Submitted-October 14, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for goods sold and delivered, the defendant Anthony Orlando appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Onofry, J.), dated September 21, 2009, as, upon an order of the same court dated September 17, 2009, granting that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against him, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $85,037.77.
ORDERED that on the Court's own motion, the notice of appeal from the order dated September 17, 2009, is deemed a premature notice of appeal from the judgment (see CPLR 5520[c] ); and it is further,
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff made a prima facie showing of its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by the submission, inter alia, of documentary evidence and the affidavit of the plaintiff's Corporate Administrator (see Lebar Constr. Corp v. HRH Constr. Corp., 292 A.D.2d 506). In opposition, the defendant Anthony Orlando (hereinafter the defendant) failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Banco Popular N. Am. v. Victory Taxi Mgt., 1 NY3d 381, 384; Beitner v. Becker, 34 AD3d 406, 408). The defendant's remaining contentions are either without merit or not properly before this Court (see Pekich v. James E. Lawrence, Inc., 38 AD3d 632, 633).
Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for summary judgment on the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendant.
RIVERA, J.P., COVELLO, SANTUCCI and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-10277 (Index No. 1002 /09)
Decided: November 16, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)