Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Khurshid Anwar, respondent, v. Hadiza Sani, appellant.
Submitted-October 26, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In a custody and visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County (Ebrahimoff, Ct.Atty.Ref.), dated March 16, 2010, which, after a hearing, granted the father's cross petition to modify the custody and visitation provisions of the parties' judgment of divorce dated September 29, 2006, so as to award him sole custody and only awarded her supervised visitation.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
“In order to modify an existing custody arrangement, there must be a showing of a subsequent change of circumstances so that modification is required to protect the best interests of the child” (Matter of Fallarino v. Ayala, 41 AD3d 714, 714; see Matter of Hongach v. Hongach, 44 AD3d 664; Matter of Heuthe v. McLaren, 1 AD3d 514). The best interests of the child are determined by a review of the totality of the circumstances (see Eschbach v. Eschbach, 56 N.Y.2d 167, 171; Matter of Fallarino v. Ayala, 41 AD3d at 714-715). Since the Family Court's custody determination is largely dependent upon an assessment of the credibility of witnesses and upon the character, temperament, and sincerity of the parents, the Family Court's determination should not be disturbed unless it lacks a sound and substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Nunn v. Bagley, 63 AD3d 1068, 1069; Matter of Carrasquillo v. Cora, 60 AD3d 852; Matter of Neu v. Neu, 303 A.D.2d 509, 510).
Here, the Family Court's award of sole custody to the father, which was consistent with the opinion of the court-appointed psychologist and the position of the attorney for the child (see Matter of Bonthu v. Bonthu, 67 AD3d 906), has a sound and substantial basis in the record and will not be disturbed.
The Family Court's determination that the mother's visitation with the child should be supervised is also supported by a sound and substantial basis in the record (id. at 907).
MASTRO, J.P., BALKIN, ENG and HALL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2010-03217 (Docket No. V-04590-08)
Decided: November 09, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)