Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Cadim Stonehenge 56th Associates, LLC, respondent, v. 57 Dry Clean Inc., etc., et al., appellants.
Argued-September 16, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of a lease, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Vaughan, J.), dated September 23, 2009, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated April 2, 2009, in favor of the plaintiff and against them in the total sum of $109,294.02, entered upon their default in filing opposition to the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.
ORDERED that the order is modified, on the facts and as an exercise of discretion, by deleting the provision thereof denying that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate so much of the judgment as was in favor of the plaintiff and against the individual defendant, Hong Jian Liu, and substituting therefor a provision granting that branch of the motion; as so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The individual defendant, Hong Jian Liu, demonstrated a reasonable excuse for his default and a potentially meritorious defense (see CPLR 5015[a][1]; Martins v. Yukhayev, 63 AD3d 697, 698). Accordingly, that branch of the defendants' motion which was to vacate so much of the judgment as was in favor of the plaintiff and against the individual defendant should be granted.
The defendants' remaining contentions are without merit.
DILLON, J.P., FLORIO, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-09362 (Index No. 28137 /07)
Decided: October 26, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)