Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Michael Rinaldi, appellant, v. William J. Rochford, et al., respondents.
Submitted-September 27, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated August 13, 2009, which granted the motion by the defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Since this action was commenced after the expiration of the statute of limitations, the Supreme Court properly granted the motion by the defendants pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(5) to dismiss the complaint as time-barred (see CPLR 214[5]; Lessoff v. 26 Ct. St. Assoc., LLC, 58 AD3d 610, 611; Tricoche v Warner Amex Satellite Entertainment Co., 48 AD3d 671, 672; Gem Flooring v. Kings Park Indus., 5 AD3d 542, 544). Further, CPLR 205(a) is inapplicable because a prior action seeking identical relief as is sought in this action was properly dismissed for lack of personal jurisdiction (see Wydallis v United States Fid. & Guar. Co., 63 N.Y.2d 872, 874; Hebrew Inst. for Deaf & Exceptional Children v Kahana, 57 AD3d 734, 735; Levinsky v. Mugermin, 52 AD3d 477; Gem Flooring v. Kings Park Indus., 5 AD3d at 544).
To the extent that the plaintiff attempted to informally seek leave to effect late service of the original summons and complaint upon the defendants pursuant to CPLR 306-b, that affirmative relief should have been sought in a notice of cross motion to the Supreme Court (see CPLR 2215; Free in Christ Pentecostal Church v Julian, 64 AD3d 1153, 1154) and, in any event, was not available to the plaintiff under the circumstances (see Leader v. Maroney, Ponzini & Spencer, 97 N.Y.2d 95, 105-106; Walker v. Chaman, 31 AD3d 751, 752; Matter of Rodamis v Cretan's Assn. Omonoia, Inc., 22 AD3d 859, 860; Smith v. Southside Hosp., 15 AD3d 387, 388; Winter v. Irizarry, 300 A.D.2d 472).
SANTUCCI, J.P., BALKIN, LEVENTHAL and AUSTIN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-09379 (Index No. 23055 /08)
Decided: October 12, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)