Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Kenneth W. McDonald, petitioner, v. New York State Division of Human Rights, et al., respondents.
Argued-September 17, 2010
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated December 12, 2008, which adopted the recommendation and findings of an administrative law judge dated October 27, 2008, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner did not establish that the respondent North Ferry Co., Inc., discriminated against him based upon his age, and dismissed the administrative complaint.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights that the respondent North Ferry Co., Inc. (hereinafter the respondent), did not discriminate against the petitioner on the basis of his age when it changed his employment status from “part-time” to “casual” is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Sauer v. Donaldson, 49 AD3d 656; Stephenson v Hotel Empls. & Rest. Empls. Union Local 100 of AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 265, 271). The respondent provided a nondiscriminatory reason for taking the action in question, and the petitioner failed to show that the reason was a pretext for discrimination (see Matter of Sauer v. Donaldson, 49 AD3d at 657; Rainer N. Mittl, Ophthalmologist, P.C. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 100 N.Y.2d 326, 330).
SANTUCCI, J.P., BALKIN, BELEN and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Matthew G. Kiernan
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-09407 (Index No. 4854 /09)
Decided: October 05, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)