Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Richard B. Dorf, petitioner, v. Ruth E. Alvalle, appellant; attorney for the child, nonparty-respondent.
Submitted-June 7, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Family Court, Suffolk County (Tarantino, Jr., J.), dated November 10, 2009, as, after a hearing, in effect, granted that branch of the motion of the attorney for the child which was to hold her in contempt for violating a prior order dated May 20, 2008, on the ground that she violated the terms and conditions thereof, and committed her to the Suffolk County Jail for a term of 10 days. By decision and order on motion dated December 4, 2009, enforcement of the order appealed from was stayed pending hearing and determination of the appeal.
ORDERED that the order dated November 10, 2009, is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, and that branch of the motion of the attorney for the child which was to hold the mother in contempt for violating the order dated May 20, 2008, is denied.
The evidence at the hearing did not establish, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the mother willfully violated a prior order of the court by depriving the father of certain visitation time with the parties' child (see Matter of Rubackin v. Rubackin, 62 AD3d 11, 15; Matter of Anonymous v. Anonymous, 222 A.D.2d 501). Accordingly, the Family Court erred in holding the mother in contempt and directing that she be incarcerated.
SKELOS, J.P., SANTUCCI, DICKERSON and LEVENTHAL, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-10429 (Docket No. V-783 /07 /09J)
Decided: August 17, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)