IN RE: Dorothea Faison (2010)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Dorothea Faison, appellant, v Nassau County Department of Social Services, et al., respondents.

2009-02780 (Docket No. V-110-09)

Decided: June 29, 2010

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. RUTH C. BALKIN LEONARD B. AUSTIN SHERI S. ROMAN, JJ.

Joseph R. Faraguna, Sag Harbor, N.Y., for appellant. John Ciampoli, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Jackie L. Gross of counsel), for respondent Nassau County Department of Social Services. Roberta Fox, Sea Cliff, N.Y., for respondent Kimson Alston. Leonard B. Symons, Williston Park, N.Y., for respondent James Stanton. Michael Kaszubski, P.C., Massapequa, N.Y., attorney for the child.

Submitted-June 10, 2010

DECISION & ORDER

In a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for custody of, or visitation with, the subject child, Dorothea Faison appeals from an order of the Family Court, Nassau County (Dane, J.), dated March 6, 2009, which, without a hearing, dismissed the petition.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner is not the biological grandmother of the subject child, and she is not a legal grandmother by virtue of adoption. She is, therefore, not the child's grandparent within the meaning of Domestic Relations Law § 72, which governs the standing of grandparents to seek custody or visitation, and has no right thereunder to seek either custody or visitation (see Matter of Jordan, 60 AD3d 764, 764-765; Matter of Gross v. Siegman, 226 A.D.2d 724; Matter of Hantman v. Heller, 213 A.D.2d 637). The petitioner's remaining contentions with respect to standing to seek custody or visitation are similarly without merit. Accordingly, the Family Court properly dismissed the petition without a hearing.

The petitioner also lacks standing to make contentions with respect to the child's prior placement with other family members and, in any event, the contentions are academic in light of the fact that the subject child is currently in her father's custody (see Matter of Josephine G., 218 A.D.2d 656, 657).

RIVERA, J.P., BALKIN, AUSTIN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Trusted by Consumers. Recognized by AI.

As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.

Explore the Network