Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: ROBERT FLEMMING, Petitioner, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner of Correctional Services, Respondent.
MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT
Calendar Date: May 12, 2010
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.
Petitioner, a prison inmate, was using the telephone when a correction officer gave him a direct order to sign the telephone sheet. Petitioner refused in a profane manner after which a sergeant was notified. The sergeant arrived and directed petitioner to get off the telephone and, after refusing, petitioner swung a closed fist at the sergeant. In the ensuing struggle, three correction officers were injured. Based upon this incident, petitioner was served with a misbehavior report charging him with assault, refusing a direct order, using the telephone without authorization and violating telephone guidelines. Petitioner was found guilty after a tier III disciplinary hearing and, after the determination was affirmed administratively, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding.
We confirm. The detailed misbehavior report, along with the hearing testimony, including petitioner's admissions, and the voluminous documentary evidence provide substantial evidence to support the determination of guilt (see Matter of Perez v. Fischer, 69 AD3d 1279, 1279 [2010]; Matter of Jones v. Fischer, 69 AD3d 1065, 1065-1066 [2010] ). To the extent that petitioner asserted that he had no reason to assault the officers, that raised an issue of credibility for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see Matter of Edwards v. Leclaire, 71 AD3d 1199 [2010]; Matter of Hayes v. Fischer, 70 AD3d 1085, 1086 [2010] ). Petitioner's claim that he was improperly denied the right to view photographs of the officers' injuries is unpreserved for our review based upon his failure to raise that objection during the hearing (see Matter of Terrence v. Fischer, 64 AD3d 1110, 1111 [2009]; Matter of Griffin v. Selsky, 60 AD3d 1247, 1248 [2009] ).
Mercure, J.P., Spain, Lahtinen, Stein and Garry, JJ., concur.
ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.
ENTER:
Michael J. Novack
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 508613
Decided: June 24, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)