Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Roselyn Mochon, appellant, v. Joseph Mochon, respondent.
Submitted-June 3, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the plaintiff former wife appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Adams, J.), dated April 15, 2009, as, in effect, denied, without prejudice to renewal, that branch of her motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440.
ORDERED that the order is reversed insofar as appealed from, on the law, with costs, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440 is granted, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for entry of an appropriate judgment.
Pursuant to Domestic Relations Law § 244, “[w]here a spouse in an action for divorce ․ defaults in paying any sum of money as required by the judgment or order directing the payment thereof ․ [u]pon application the court shall make an order directing the entry of judgment for the amount of arrears of child support together with costs and disbursements.”
Here, the defendant former husband did not dispute the plaintiff former wife's contention that he owed the sum of $49,440 in child support arrears. Since Domestic Relations Law § 244 requires that a judgment be entered upon application when a party is in default on child support payments (see Moheban v. Moheban, 149 A.D.2d 488; see also Matter of Dox v. Tynon, 90 N.Y.2d 166), it was error for the Supreme Court to deny, without prejudice to renewal, that branch of the plaintiff's motion which was for an order directing entry of a judgment for child support arrears in the sum of $49,440.
MASTRO, J.P., FLORIO, BELEN and ROMAN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-05400 (Index No. 4388 /04)
Decided: June 22, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)