Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., appellant, v. Joseph R. (Anonymous), respondent.
Submitted-May 25, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the People from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Kahn, J.), rendered November 4, 2009, adjudicating the defendant a youthful offender, upon his plea of guilty to use of a child in a sexual performance, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, the youthful offender adjudication and the sentence imposed are vacated, and the case is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
A youth otherwise eligible to be classified as a youthful offender is ineligible for youthful offender treatment if he or she has previously been adjudicated a youthful offender following a determination that he or she committed an act or acts defined as a felony (see CPL 720.10[2][c] ). “This restriction, relating to the eligible youth determination, is applicable at the time of conviction” (People v. Cecil Z., 57 N.Y.2d 899, 901). Since, at the time that the defendant pleaded guilty to use of a child in a sexual performance, he had previously been adjudicated a youthful offender upon a determination that he committed an act or acts defined as a felony, he was not an eligible youth, and his youthful offender adjudication was unlawful, as was his sentence. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment, vacate the youthful offender adjudication and the sentence imposed, and remit the matter to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings on the indictment, which shall, among other things, afford the defendant an opportunity to withdraw his plea of guilty.
There is no merit to the defendant's contentions regarding the viability of the People's appeal and this Court's jurisdiction to entertain it.
FISHER, J.P., SANTUCCI, MILLER and LOTT, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-11789 (Ind.No. 949 /09)
Decided: June 22, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)