Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. QUAYSHAUN R. HUBBARD, Appellant.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Calendar Date: May 12, 2010
Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Chemung County (Hayden, J.), rendered December 19, 2008, upon a verdict convicting defendant of the crimes of burglary in the first degree (two counts), burglary in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree and assault in the second degree.
Defendant was charged in a seven-count indictment with various crimes after he and another individual forced their way into the victim's home and proceeded to restrain, assault and rob him. Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of two counts of burglary in the first degree, burglary in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, robbery in the third degree and assault in the second degree. County Court sentenced defendant to an aggregate prison term of 12 years and postrelease supervision of five years, and he now appeals.
We affirm. Defendant, who was 16 years old when he committed the crimes in question, argues that County Court erred in failing to consider him for youthful offender treatment. His age was mentioned only in passing at sentencing, however, and he waived his right to be considered for youthful offender treatment by failing to request it (see People v. McGowen, 42 N.Y.2d 905, 906 [1977]; People v. Rogers, 5 AD3d 871, 872 [2004], lv denied 3 NY3d 647 [2004]; cf. People v. Robinson, 110 A.D.2d 939, 939 [1985] ). Were we to address the issue, we would perceive no reason to accord youthful offender status to defendant given the gravity of the offenses and his substantial role in committing them (see People v. Hopper, 39 AD3d 1030, 1031-1032 [2007]; People v. Howard, 1 AD3d 718, 719 [2003] ).
Rose, J.P., Lahtinen, Malone Jr., Garry and Egan Jr., JJ., concur.
ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.
ENTER:
Michael J. Novack
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 102420
Decided: June 17, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)