Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Estate of Kevin Daniell, etc., appellant, v. Janet Demarzo, etc., et al., respondents.
Submitted-May 27, 2010
DECISION & JUDGMENT
Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the State of New York Department of Health dated July 31, 2008, which, after a fair hearing, upheld a determination of the Department of Social Services of the County of Suffolk dated February 1, 2007, denying the application of the petitioner's decedent for medical assistance benefits.
ADJUDGED that the petition is granted, on the law, with one bill of costs, the determination is annulled, and the matter is remitted to the respondent Janet DeMarzo, as Commissioner of the Department of Social Services of the County of Suffolk, for further proceedings consistent herewith.
The evidence presented at the fair hearing established that, as a result of having to wait for letters of administration, the petitioner failed to meet the deadline set by the Department of Social Services of the County of Suffolk (hereinafter DSS) for the production of the necessary documentation to verify the decedent's eligibility for medical assistance benefits for the approximate 41/212-month period of hospitalization prior to his death. However, prior to the time of the fair hearing, the petitioner submitted the requested documentation. Under the particular circumstances of this case, there was an insufficient basis for the determination of the State of New York Department of Health (hereinafter DOH) upholding DSS's denial of benefits (see Matter of Eichna v. Demarzo, 52 AD3d 513; Matter of Taylor v. Bane, 199 A.D.2d 1071; Matter of Segall v. D'Elia, 92 A.D.2d 897). DOH should have remitted the matter to DSS for a new determination based on the documentation submitted.
DILLON, J.P., BALKIN, ENG and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
As the largest network of trusted legal brands, we help firms build authority across the platforms consumers and AI systems rely on most. Our network helps attorneys strengthen visibility, credibility, and preference where legal decisions begin.
Docket No: 2009-07152 (Index No. 42355 /08)
Decided: June 15, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)