Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Gerard T. Goonan, appellant, v. New York City Transit Authority, respondent.
Argued-May 3, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lane, J.), entered November 24, 2008, as denied that branch of his motion which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3215 for leave to enter a default judgment.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.
The plaintiff commenced this action seeking damages for personal injuries after he allegedly was injured on a bus owned and operated by the defendant. The defendant timely served an answer upon the plaintiff. Thereafter, the plaintiff moved, inter alia, for leave to enter a default judgment on the ground that the defendant had not filed its answer with the clerk of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court denied that branch of the plaintiff's motion. We affirm the order insofar as appealed from.
A plaintiff may seek leave to enter a default judgment when a defendant, among other things, has failed to appear within the time required (see CPLR 3215 [a]; Okeke v. Ewool, 66 AD3d 978, 979). A defendant appears, inter alia, by serving an answer upon the plaintiff (see CPLR 320[a]; Cerrito v. Galioto, 216 A.D.2d 265, 266; cf. Ahmad v. Aniolowiski, 28 AD3d 692, 693). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, there is no statutory or other requirement that an answer, timely served upon a plaintiff, must also be filed with the clerk of the relevant court in order for a defendant to appear in the action. Here, the defendant appeared in the action by timely serving its answer upon the plaintiff (see CPLR 320[a]; Siegel, N.Y. Prac § 110, at 199 [4th ed] ) and, therefore, there was no default.
The plaintiff's remaining contentions are without merit.
FISHER, J.P., DICKERSON, ENG and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-00955 (Index No. 2476 /08)
Decided: June 01, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)