Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
IN RE: Devon Defonte B.-S. (Anonymous). Administration for Children's Services, petitioner-respondent; Christine B. (Anonymous), appellant; Jeffrey S. (Anonymous), nonparty-respondent.
Submitted-May 3, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In a neglect proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 10, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Danoff, J.), dated February 23, 2009, which denied her motion to vacate an order of fact-finding and disposition dated July 16, 2008, which, upon her default in appearing at the fact-finding and dispositional hearing, found that she derivatively neglected the subject child and awarded custody to the father.
ORDERED that the order dated February 23, 2009, is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
The Family Court properly denied the mother's motion to vacate the fact-finding and dispositional order dated July 16, 2008, entered upon her default in appearing at the hearing scheduled for 9:30 A.M. on that day. The mother failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for the default or a meritorious defense to the petition. The mother's unsworn assertion that she was misinformed by the Family Court as to the date and time of the hearing is belied by the record, which shows that she was present when the scheduling of the hearing was announced. Accordingly, the Family Court correctly concluded that the mother “willfully refused to appear at the hearing” (Family Ct Act § 1042; see Matter of Nicholas S., 46 AD3d 830, 831; Matter of W. Children, 256 A.D.2d 412, 413; Matter of Jamel H., 187 A.D.2d 513). Moreover, the mother failed to demonstrate a meritorious defense to the derivative allegations based on the proceedings concerning the subject child's siblings (see Matter of Amber C., 38 AD3d 538, 540; Matter of Hannah UU., 300 A.D.2d 942, 944; Matter of Baby Boy W., 283 A.D.2d 584, 585; Matter of Cruz, 121 A.D.2d 901, 902-903), or to offer any reason why it would be against the child's best interest to remain with the father, in whose custody he has been since he was one month old.
FISHER, J.P., DICKERSON, ENG and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-03424 (Docket Nos. N-23358-06, V-29887-06)
Decided: May 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)