IN RE: Moises Mera (2010)

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

IN RE: Moises Mera, appellant, v Gloria Rodriguez, respondent.

2009-05628 (Docket No. V-1465-08)

Decided: May 18, 2010

REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P. ANITA R. FLORIO DANIEL D. ANGIOLILLO PLUMMER E. LOTT, JJ.

Helene Migdon Greenberg, Elmsford, N.Y., for appellant. Proskauer Rose LLP, New York, N.Y. (Steven H. Holinstat of counsel), and Joanne N. Sirotkin, White Plains, N.Y., for respondent (one brief filed). Thea S. Beaver, Mamaroneck, N.Y., attorney for the child. Further, the Family Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in declining to proceed with psychological evaluations of the parties before suspending visitation (see Matter of Rhodie v Nathan, 67 AD3d 687; Matter of Johnson v Williams, 59 AD3d 445; Matter of Potente v Wasilewski, 51 AD3d 675). The Family Court had the benefit of the reports of the director of the relevant supervised visitation program at the YMCA and the child's therapist, which evaluated and discussed the child's psychological status and feelings regarding engaging in therapeutic supervised visitation with the father, a letter from the father's therapist, which evaluated and discussed the father's parenting skills, the in camera interview of the child wherein the Family Court was able to assess firsthand the child's feelings towards the father and the prospect of having to engage in therapeutic supervised visitation with him, and the position advocated by the attorney for the child.

Argued-April 22, 2010

DECISION & ORDER

In a visitation proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of a corrected order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Edlitz, J.), entered June 3, 2009, as denied, without a hearing, his petition to modify a prior order of the same court dated March 6, 2008, which, inter alia, permitted him to have only therapeutic supervised visitation with the subject child once it was deemed therapeutically appropriate, and suspended all visitation between him and the subject child.

ORDERED that the corrected order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

“A court must determine the best interests of the child when adjudicating ․ visitation issues. The determination of visitation issues is entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court, and should not be disturbed on appeal unless it lacks a substantial evidentiary basis in the record” (Matter of Thompson v. Yu-Thompson, 41 AD3d 487, 488; see Jordan v. Jordan, 8 AD3d 444). “[A] noncustodial parent should have reasonable rights of visitation, and the denial of those rights to a natural parent is a drastic remedy which should only be invoked when there is substantial evidence that visitation would be detrimental to the child” (Matter of Grisanti v. Grisanti, 4 AD3d 471, 473 [internal quotation marks and citation omitted] ).

The Family Court's determination that therapeutic supervised visitation would be psychologically detrimental to, and not in the best interests of, the subject child has a sound and substantial basis in the record and should not be disturbed (see Matter of Thompson v. Yu-Thompson, 41 AD3d 487). To the extent that the Family Court relied upon the in camera interview of the then-12-year-old child, it was entitled to place great weight on the wishes of the child, who was mature enough to express his wishes (see Matter of O'Connor v. Dyer, 18 AD3d 757; Koppenhoefer v. Koppenhoefer, 159 A.D.2d 113).

RIVERA, J.P., FLORIO, ANGIOLILLO and LOTT, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

James Edward Pelzer

Clerk of the Court

Was this helpful?

Why was this helpful?

Easy to understand

Solved my problem

Other

Why was this not helpful?

Missing the information I need

Too complicated / too many steps

Out of date

Other

Thank you for your feedback!

Welcome to FindLaw's Cases & Codes

A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.

Go To Learn About The Law