Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Albert Suchmacher, et al., respondents, v. Manana Grocery, et al., defendants, Carmen Webb, appellant.
Argued-April 20, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant Carmen Webb appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (McMahon, J.), dated July 28, 2009, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against her.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
A CPLR 3211(a)(1) motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence may be appropriately granted “only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes plaintiff's factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 98 N.Y.2d 314, 326; see Leon v. Martinez, 84 N.Y.2d 83, 88; Fontanetta v. John Doe 1, AD3d, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 02743 [2d Dept 2010]; Lucia v. Goldman, 68 AD3d 1064; Elm Sea Realty Corp. v. Chicoy, 68 AD3d 1047; Schwarz Supply Source v. Redi Bag USA, LLC, 64 AD3d 696). Although documents such as deeds, which reflect out-of-court transactions and are essentially unassailable, qualify as “documentary evidence” within the intended scope of CPLR 3211(a)(1), affidavits and deposition testimony do not (see Fontanetta v. John Doe 1, AD3d, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 02743 [2d Dept 2010] ).
Here, even if a 1995 deed by which the appellant transferred, to her son, the title of the premises at which the subject accident allegedly occurred were sufficient to conclusively establish that the appellant did not own the premises on the date of the accident, the appellant failed to offer any qualifying documentary evidence to refute the plaintiffs' allegation that she “operated, managed and controlled” the premises. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly denied the appellant's motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) to dismiss the amended complaint insofar as asserted against her (see Fontanetta v. John Doe 1, AD3d, 2010 N.Y. Slip Op 02743 [2d Dept 2010]; Lucia v. Goldman, 68 AD3d 1064; Elm Sea Realty Corp. v. Chicoy, 68 AD3d 1047; Schwarz Supply Source v. Redi Bag USA, LLC, 64 AD3d 696).
DILLON, J.P., MILLER, DICKERSON and CHAMBERS, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-07823 (Index No. 102248 /07)
Decided: May 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)