Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Joan L. Sutton, appellant, v. Elias Kassapides, respondent, et al., defendants.
Argued-April 23, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Hart, J.), dated February 18, 2009, which denied her motion pursuant to CPLR 4404(a) to set aside a jury verdict in favor of the defendant Elias Kassapides, and for a new trial.
ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and as a matter of discretion, with costs, the motion is granted, the jury verdict is set aside, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice.
The plaintiff was deprived of a fair trial in this medical malpractice action as a result of the cumulative effect of the improper conduct of the trial court, both during cross-examination and in its charge to the jury (see Matter of Travelers Indem. Co. v Mohammed, 14 AD3d 710; Ougourlian v New York City Health & Hosps. Corp., 5 AD3d 644, 645; Perkins v. New York Racing Assn., 51 A.D.2d 585, 586). In addition, the trial court erred in giving an “error in judgment” charge (see Nestorowich v. Ricotta, 97 N.Y.2d 393, 399 n 4; PJI 2:150). There was no evidence that the defendant surgeon, Elias Kassapides, had to consider and choose among medically acceptable alternatives regarding the treatment of the plaintiff (see Nestorowich v. Ricotta, 97 N.Y.2d at 399-400; Rospierski v. Haar, 59 AD3d 1048, 1049; Vanderpool v Adirondack Neurosurgical Specialists, P.C., 45 AD3d 1477, 1478; Martin v. Lattimore Rd. Surgicenter, 281 A.D.2d 866). Accordingly, we remit the matter to the Supreme Court, Queens County, for a new trial before a different Justice.
FISHER, J.P., BALKIN, ROMAN and SGROI, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-03771 (Index No. 8896 /05)
Decided: May 18, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)