Learn About the Law
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
The People, etc., respondent, v. Patrick Jabbour, appellant.
Submitted-April 16, 2010
DECISION & ORDER
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Donnino, J.), rendered April 3, 2009, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.
ORDERED that judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court properly granted the People's application for leave to amend counts three and four of the indictment to change the description of the weapon he possessed to a gravity knife (see Penal Law §§ 265.01[1], 265.02[1]; People v. Ward, 57 AD3d 582; People v. Hood, 194 A.D.2d 556, 557). The amendments did not change the theory of the prosecution, and served simply to conform the indictment to the evidence presented to the grand jury, and to accurately reflect the criminal acts for which the grand jury intended to indict the defendant (see People v. Hood, 194 A.D.2d at 557). Furthermore, the defendant failed to show that he was prejudiced by the amendments (see People v. Ward, 57 AD3d at 582; People v. Logan, 19 AD3d 939, 942). In addition, the amendments did not cure a failure of the indictment to “charge or state an offense” in violation of CPL 200.70(2) because the subject counts were not jurisdictionally defective (see People v. D'Angelo, 98 N.Y.2d 733, 734; People v. Ray, 71 N.Y.2d 849, 850; People v. Place, 50 AD3d 1313, 1314; People v. Champion, 20 AD3d 772, 774; see also People v. Jennings, 60 AD3d 694).
MASTRO, J.P., COVELLO, ENG and BELEN, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
James Edward Pelzer
Clerk of the Court
Thank you for your feedback!
A free source of state and federal court opinions, state laws, and the United States Code. For more information about the legal concepts addressed by these cases and statutes visit FindLaw's Learn About the Law.
Docket No: 2009-04064 (Ind.No. 2041 /08)
Decided: May 11, 2010
Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)
Harness the power of our directory with your own profile. Select the button below to sign up.
Learn more about FindLaw’s newsletters, including our terms of use and privacy policy.
Get help with your legal needs
FindLaw’s Learn About the Law features thousands of informational articles to help you understand your options. And if you’re ready to hire an attorney, find one in your area who can help.
Search our directory by legal issue
Enter information in one or both fields (Required)